I remember when we had safety and
trust and how it felt. We were proud. We believed. We were unique. We knew that
if we followed our map all problems could and would be solved. Yet today, we
seem to be losing that map piece by piece. We are also losing our national sense
of direction and purpose. “We” is repeated and repeated here because “We” is
followed by “the People” in our constitution. We are those people! This makes
the events we view in today’s Washington even more frightening. The recent
words and images on display in Washington present us as a country reduced to a
war of words, name calling, labeling, posturing, clear ignorance of the
Constitution and even lies by the President. These images provide the “We the
people” a front and center slide show of a very rapidly changing constitutional
map with a bleak future
“We the People
of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,
insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the
general welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of
America.” (September 17, 1787).
To these historic words we added The Bill of Rights. (December
15, 1791) The Bill of Rights extended the people’s confidence in the government
and were created “in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers”.
The “Then” and “Now” comparisons used
below paint two different pictures of “We the People”. The words above remain
the same today but their meaning and their promise is changing.
Then: Our Framers specifically chose a
limited executive, legislative and judiciary government. The creation of the
Bill of Rights made it complete with specific checks and balances and
limitations for each branch and very specific rights granted to people and states.
and Now: Our government grows larger and larger
with each passing day. “We the People” are increasingly being taken care of much
as a good farmer tends to his livestock and we demand more. States now have no
choice except to bow to ever demanding “government can do it better” and “you
are wrong” rules and mandates.
Then: Our Founders were either Federalist
or Non Federalist. The Non Federalists feared a centralized and powerful
government. To reduce Non Federalists’ fears, our first senators, were elected
by state legislatures rather than by a direct citizen vote. Those senators served
at the pleasure of the state and not the government and were expected to
faithfully represent state desires and not his own or the desires of others.
Centralized power was, indeed, limited with specific checks.
and Now: The 17th Amendment was passed
by Congress on May 13, 1912 and Ratified on April 8, 1913. We destroyed the
Framers intent. Some senators clearly do not even try to protect the state from
the government and they all seek continued status in its chambers. States’
rights are clearly being limited and, our government has now grown to those
levels feared and rejected by the Non Federalists.
Then: The focus of the Supreme Court was specifically
limited to “all Cases in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution”. The
Court’s Justices had identified limited responsibilities.
and Now: Today, these judges experience lifelong
appointments and function well beyond their intended purposes. The court’s judges have chosen not to be
limited to decisions to “support” and “protect” the Constitution and contribute
to the expanding federal influence. I must admit I simply do not understand why
five to four votes are as good and as permanent as nine to zero votes.
The “Then” and “Now “ guide above
also reveals increased citizens, elected leaders and Supreme Court Judges
claiming our Constitution and Bill of Rights are quaint and antiquated and are
not representative or workable today. We call them Progressives and/or
Liberals. They propose the adoption of
different beliefs. Since the 17th Amendment became law in 1913, we
can clearly trace the progress of these beliefs which change the purpose for
and application of beliefs in the Framers Constitution. Read about their goals
and the claimed benchmark achievements from President Woodrow Wilson through the
100 years to Barack Obama and you will reveal a planned piece by piece
Constitutional Republic versus Utopia value struggle. Unlike our Framers secure
and clear path the Utopian path is very steep, slippery and dangerous and has
always failed.
It is possible, of course, that we may experience the emergence of a Founder’s type leader and the return to what “we”
once believed a life time ago. In this spirit, I close with the words of Walt Kelly’s
cartoon character, “Pogo”.
“Sir, we have met the enemy and he is
us.”
Published in The Alpena News on October 12, 2013